| The
First Transatlantic
Telephonic Transmission To the Editor of the SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN:
I am
preparing a short history of wireless
telephony,
and having been for some years out of touch with this line of work, am
unable to obtain certain rather important data relative to the history
of the Art. Since the SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN
reaches so many thousands of engineers it has occurred to me that the
information
might be obtained if you would be so kind as to publish this letter of
inquiry with the statement that I should be extremely obliged if those
engineers having the information at their disposal would please forward
it to me. The first point in
regard to which
information is
desired is this: About
November, 1906, my Brant Rock, Massachusetts,
and Macrihamish, Scotland, wireless stations were in operation, and we
were working mostly "G" tuner frequency 70,000 cycles per second, to
avoid
daylight absorption.
We shut down for about a month at this
time to make
some change in the sending apparatus of the Macrihamish end, but
continued
sending occasionally from Brant Rock, though most of the time at Brant
Rock was spent, while waiting for Macrihamish to be completed, in
installing
and testing our new wireless telephone system between the station at
Brant
Rock, Massachusetts, and a station at Plymouth, Massachusetts, about
twelve
miles away.
Meantime the operators at Macrihamish
were listening
regularly every night to other stations, partly for the purpose of
keeping
in practice and obtaining data as to atmospheric absorption, etc., and
partly so as to be sure to get any messages which might be sent from
Brant
Rock, as we were using wireless exclusively in order to save cable
expenses.
Practically all the listening was done on "G" tune as we had shortly
previously
made our very important discovery, later published in the Electrician,
that while the absorption increased with increased wave length up to
about
100,000 frequency, beyond that point the absorption fell off very
rapidly
as the frequency was decreased until at about 70,000 frequency the
absorption
was comparatively small.
Sometime, I think, in November, 1906, I
received
a registered letter marked Personal from one of the
Macrihamish
operators. In this letter he stated that he had been listening in on a
certain date, which he specified, and at a certain hour, about four
o'clock
in the morning as I recollect it, and had noticed a remarkable
phenomenon
which showed that speech could be transmitted by speaking in proximity
to the rotary spark gap (we were then using 10 kw. rotary spark gap,
giving
about 500 or 1,000 sparks per second). He stated that at the date and
hour
specified he had heard one of our Brant Rock engineers giving
instructions
to one of his assistants in regard to the running of the dynamo; that
the
speech had come in very clear and plain, and that he was able to
identify
the speaker as Mr. Stein (now, I believe, with the Bell Telephone
Company);
he wrote out in detail the words which he stated he had heard Mr. Stein
speak to his assistant as he had written them down after hearing them;
the whole amounting to five or six sentences totalling between fifty
and
one hundred words.
He stated that he had not reported this
to me by
wireless because other stations listening in might have got the report
and he considered it too important to run any risk of premature
disclosure.
He also stated that he was sending it by special registered letter for
the same reason.
My first thought was that the operator
had made
some mistake and that possibly some experimenters in England had also
been
working with my wireless telephone, since the patent disclosing the
invention
had been issued some years previously, and we had given a number of
demonstrations
of the telephoning operation.
However, I called in Mr. Stein and
repeated to him
the instructions which the Macrihamish operator had overheard Stein
giving
to his assistant, and asked Mr. Stein if he had given any such
instructions
to his assistant in the Brant Rock station. Mr. Stein stated at once
that
he had not given any such instructions to his assistant in the Brant
Rock
station and that the instructions so given did not relate to any of the
apparatus in the Brant Rock station, but related to the motor generator
set for driving the high frequency telephone arc at the Plymouth
station.
I asked Mr. Stein when he gave the instructions, and he said he did not
know, but could tell by looking up the station log, which he did and
reported
that they were given on the night of a certain date, between certain
hours
on that night, those hours being the hours as shown by the station log
between which tests were being made which would require such
instructions
being given.
The date and hours given by Mr. Stein
without
knowledge
of the date and hours given by the Macrihamish operator, coincided
exactly,
after allowance had been made for the difference in time between
Macrihamish
and Brant Rock, with the date and hour given by the Macrihamish
operator,
and it became evident at once that what had happened was that the
Macrihamish
operator, listening on "G" tune which was the same frequency used for
working
telegraphically between the Brant Rock and Macrihamish stations and the
frequency used for working telephonically between Brant Rock and
Plymouth,
had overheard Mr. Stein at the Brant Rock station giving instructions
by
wireless telephone to his assistant at the Plymouth wireless telephone
station.
In this connection I would say that the
Macrihamish
operator's conjecture that speech transmission was due to the fact that
Mr. Stein was standing near the rotating arc gap when giving his
instructions,
was formed without his knowing that we had just received our first high
frequency generator which had been built in our Washington shops (I may
say that this high frequency dynamo giving about ½ kw. at
70,000
cycles, a photograph of which appeared in the Electrical
Review
for February 15, 1907, was still in good condition last year after ten
years' service though not so efficient electrically as the larger sized
high frequency dynamos later so admirably designed by Mr. Alexanderson
and built for us by the General Electric Company).
The Macrihamish operator's theory that
speech might
be transmitted wirelessly by speaking close up to an arc was aside from
its ingenuity by no means unsound for I later made some experiments to
test this point and found that under certain conditions and with the
arc
at a certain adjustment, speech could actually be so transmitted,
though
the articulation was not good enough for commercial work. The reason why the
operator did not
get the talking
every night will be seen from examining the curve showing variation of
intensity of transatlantic messages for the month of January, 1906,
published
in the Electrical Review, May 11, 1906, and
reproduced
herewith.
From this curve it will be seen that
during the
month of January the average intensity of the messages was less than
five
time audibility, but that on five nights, i. e.,
January 9th,
10th,
11th, 29th and 30th, it was above 100 times audibility; on one night,
January
10th, it was 225 times audibility, and on one night, January 30th, it
was
500 times audibility, the signals on these latter two nights being so
loud
that they could be heard all over the receiving room with the head
phones
lying on the table. This curve of intensity of transatlantic wireless
transmission
was made with the 10 kw. telegraph set referred to above. Consequently
since the 70,000 cycle alternator only gave ½ kw., the
intensity
of telegraphic signals received from it would only be 1/20 as strong,
and
consequently would only be heard on the five nights on which the
intensity
was more than 20 with the 10 kw. set.
In addition to this, however, telephonic
transmission
is not so efficient as telegraphic transmission, i. e.,
it
takes
more power to telephone wirelessly a given distance than it does to
telegraph
wirelessly. In my paper on Wireless Telegraphy, (American Institute,
Electrical
Engineers, June 29, 1908) I have given the ratio experimentally
determined
as 10:1, for good telephonic transmission. Assuming this ratio, we see
that telephonic transmission could only be accomplished across the
Atlantic
on those two nights, January 10th and 30th, on which the transmission
was
more than 200 times audibility, and consequently it was only a few days
during each of the winter months that the Macrihamish observer was able
to overhear the telephonic transmission between Brant Rock and
Plymouth.
After ascertaining these facts, I
decided to give
a demonstration of transatlantic wireless telephony at the earliest
possible
moment, and pushed forward the construction of the new 1½
kw.
generator
which was being designed for us by Mr. Alexanderson.
About a week or ten days later, I
received a second
letter from the Macrihamish operator, stating that he had heard the
talking
again, giving dates and times and record of the words said, and urging
that I take up the matter at once. A program of transatlantic
telephonic
tests was drawn up, and arrangements were made to carry out a series of
telephonic tests between Brant Rock and Macrihamish, when unfortunately
owing to the carelessness of one of the contractors employed in
shifting
some of the supporting cables of the Macrihamish (as described in the Engineer,
January 18th and 25th, 1907), it fell down on December 6th,
1906.
No publication was made at the time of
the results
of these two pioneer instances of transatlantic telephonic
communication
because prior to and at that time there had occurred a considerable
number
of instances where entirely false claims had been made in regard to
transatlantic
working, and some which the writer had had a hand in exposing; for
example,
the false claim that messages had been transmitted across the Atlantic
to Newfoundland, and any statement made that telephonic transmission
had
been accomplished across the Atlantic would have been looked upon with
incredulity especially in view of the fact that Macrihamish tower had
fallen
down, and hence no confirming demonstration could be given.
It was therefore decided to wait until
the
Macrihamish
tower had been rebuilt, and then give a public demonstration before
making
any public reference to these facts mentioned above.
The Macrihamish tower was however, never
rebuilt,
and consequently the public demonstration was never given.
A history of wireless telegraphy and
telephony such
as the one which the writer has at present in preparation, would,
however,
be incomplete without reference to these facts, and as I have been so
long
disconnected with wireless telegraphy, and am not able to obtain the
correspondence
and records relating to this matter I should be very much obliged if
any
of the readers of the SCIENTIFIC
AMERICAN
who may have of the facts would please write me.
- What
was the name of the Macrihamish
operator who
notified me of these
two pioneer instances of transatlantic telephonic
transmission?
- What were the dates and times at
which they took
place?
- Is
my recollection correct that it
was Mr. Stein whom
the operator
overheard
giving instructions to his assistant?
- Who were the operators in
Guantanamo,
Panama, and
Nebraska (or was it
Michigan?),
who wrote me about that time that they had overheard our telephonic
work
between Brant Rock and Plymouth, giving dates and times?
In addition to the above
I should be very glad to
obtain
information in regard to the following other points:
- In what publication
or publications
and on what date
did the writer's
first
description of his system of telegraphing by pure sine waves without
making
or breaking the circuit, appear? The first test was made in 1892 at the
standard Laboratory and later continued at Purdue and Pittsburgh
Universities
and in some place a full description has been published of the
apparatus
which description I have been unable to locate.
- In what publication and on what
date
did the writer's
description of
his
resonance analyzer appear? This was a system of parallel tune circuits,
tuned to different frequencies, used for analyzing complex periodic
functions.
It was built by Queen & Company for the writer about 1901, and
the
publication describes its application to the measurements of the
frequencies
of static disturbances at different hours of the day, and their
relative
intensities. Though it has since been superseded by the heterodyne
analyzer,
it is not unimportant historically.
- Who were the students at Purdue who
in 1892-93
carried out the tests on
the writer's hot wire anemometer and is any copy of this thesis still
in
existence?
Any information in
regard to the above will be most
gratefully received.
REGINALD A. FESSENDEN.
185 Franklin St., Boston, Mass. | |